I wrote this article series in four parts over two months during the height of the coronavirus pandemic to examine how the pandemic and its lockdowns affected those in the business of risk adjustment, and what happens with the industry as the world returns to “normalcy.”
By Will Stabler
First published on May 3, 2020
The COVID-19 pandemic has sent a tsunami through every industry on the planet, and those of us who work in the business of risk adjustment (RA) are not immune from its effects. Surviving this pandemic means toughing it out, but truly thriving through it is all about finding opportunities and re-imagining how we operate while we are living in a bleak new environment for doing so.
In this series I will look—primarily through a Medicare Advantage lens—at the COVID-19 pandemic from the standpoint of its near-, medium- and long-term effects on the business of risk adjustment and the professionals working in this novel RA landscape. I will also consider changes that are already happening in the broader risk adjustment world in both the government and business sectors because of the pandemic, highlighting opportunities in where things seem to be heading.
As the end of 2020 rapidly nears, it is time for thinking forward toward your goals for the new year, whether you want to call them resolutions or not. For many reasons that I won’t go into detail here, 2021 promises to present less of those situations that take the control of our destiny out of your hands. In this article I want to show you how to put control over your goals into your hands and provide you with tools to help you reach them. Let’s start with your motivation for setting them.
Among the places we will venture in this series are:
By now most organizations working in RA have adjusted to the physical aspects of working in the new “stay at home” reality. We have our offices set up at home and we have worked the kinks out in Zoom or Skype or whatever modality we are using to communicate with our staff and providers.
So now we are much more technologically adept (right?), collaborating and sharing information almost exclusively by electronic means. Unfortunately, if you are like most people in this business, generally speaking, that was not what you were doing before the restrictions of the pandemic forced this on you. Back then (seems like such a long time ago) most of the information you had collected for retrospective review once you were locked down was on paper. And if you were behind in that process at the time, you now are facing more challenges than those who were more reasonably ahead of the game.
Many in RA have been harping on the need for electronic medical record connectivity and interoperability for years, and I consider myself to be one of the loudest in the choir. I just thought that one or several among us would be the champions driving the process—not some evil, mutating, microscopic monster.
As it has always been in nature, those who adapt tend to survive and thrive, so continue with your retro record collection and review process with the limitations that have been placed on you by not being able to meet with your contacts on site. But also focus on developing greater capacity in electronic retrieval methods with vendors or establishing EMR connectivity where you can.
One improvement goal to consider during this period is developing incremental incentives for establishing electronic connectivity. It will help future-proof operations if a potential second wave of coronavirus hits later this year or continues to persist into the future. Any planning you do at this point must take into account that we could soon be back in lockdown once things start opening up again. Connectivity is just one opportunity that has been created/accelerated in this new environment. Telehealth is another, and its time may be finally here.
On April 10, the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS) sent a letter to all “Medicare Advantage, Cost, PACE and Demonstration Organizations” that has been a long time in coming titled, “Applicability of diagnoses from telehealth services for risk adjustment.” The letter starts: “The 2019 Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in an urgency to expand the use of virtual care to reduce the risk of spreading the virus; CMS is stating that Medicare Advantage (MA) organizations and other organizations that submit diagnoses for risk adjusted payment are able to submit diagnoses for risk adjustment that are from telehealth visits when those visits meet all criteria for risk adjustment eligibility, which include being from an allowable inpatient, outpatient or professional service, and from a face-to-face encounter.”
The letter provides these details: “In order to report services to the EDS that have been provided through telehealth, use place of service code ‘02’ for telehealth or use the CPT telehealth modifier ‘95’ with any place of service.”
Based on this guidance for use in risk adjustment, we need to keep up vigorous support and advocacy for the use of telehealth through IHAs or provider office leads. Urge provider offices that might not have previously established a capability to consider identifying a telehealth capability vendor that can be made available for their offices. Develop provider education on telehealth coding and documentation requirements. Consider modifying provider incentives to encourage the use of this modality in assessing and managing patients.
Other ways to support provider networks in using telehealth include:
This lockdown period is the prime time to take advantage of new telehealth opportunities that have been created by the pandemic in closing emerging care gaps that are likely being created by the crisis and resultant restrictions on access to care.
Where provider networks are not able to use telehealth, layer in telehealth in-home assessments for members. There can and should also be linkages with care management support as well as battery of assessments related to SDoH that provide referral points.
Remember, there will be an eventual transition to opening back up. And there will also be the possibility that we will be forced to go back into severe social-distancing again.
What to do during that transition will be the focus of the next article in this series.